LASERS by Anonymous Coward Score2 29 0712AMReWhy

However, HawkEye Innovations also report that the average error of the machine is 3. 6mm. It also changed the way the puck performed on the ice. With proper filtering these are eliminated and the output is little noisy and suffers from occasional jumps and hiccups. That is valid problem however have no clue if that or something else is the actual problem youre so concerned about your posts are as clear as black mud. Yes, Hawkeye can be inaccurate.

The claim that the Hawkeye system gives an average of about four millimetres of error seems somewhat reasonable, given that were getting accuracy greater better than two centimetres on detecting objects with single camera with optics as large as the last segment of typical pinky. Anybody read it out there? The article says the system takes into account the compression of the ball and the fact that it skids on the ground.

by Keychain Score2 29, 0757AM3 replies beneath your curr. thought the current fresnel lens optical systems were just fine. by DerekLyons Score2 29, 0921PMReWhy not use…

by Dave_M_26 Score1 30, 0741AM1 reply beneath your current threshold. ReWhy not, it works for shopping carts Score5, Funny by b4dc0d3r 1268512 on 29, 0649AM 23989031 Thats compatibility for legacy analog shopping carts with the one wheel stuck sideways. by Anpheus Score2 29, 0224AM ReWhy not use… But this is rather popular feeling. Depending on the features and benchmarks of the electronic system, it or not be more accurate than human observer. by Drathos Score2 30, 0411AMReWhy not use… by TheGavster Score2 29, 1252PMReWhy not use…

Especially with such small ball, mounting rugidtized radio transmitter ball probably has to go through 20gs or something would probably mess with the balance and how the ball deforms. Reply to This Parent ReWhy not use… Thats why its used as the definitive word.

Score5, Interesting by InadequateCamel 515839 on 29, 1231AM 23987535 Further to that, if the transmitter cant survive in soccer ball where wellstruck shot probably moves around 120130 kph then theres no way it will handle travelling over kph after serve, followed by at least kph forehand return >300 kph in fraction of second!.Also, radio transmitter cannot account for the distortion of ball upon impact, which will depend on velocity, angle of rotation, angle of impact, surface being played on, etc etc etc… ReWhy not use… Reply to This ReSummary Miseleading? No Wai! by Zackbass Score2 29, 1015AM1 reply beneath your current threshold.
No tags for this post.